Measuring Agent Performance Against a Human Baseline, Fairly
The honest answer to "is the agent better than a person?" is almost never a single number. A fair comparison means defining the same task, g
Measuring, testing, and trusting agents in production. · 55 articles
The honest answer to "is the agent better than a person?" is almost never a single number. A fair comparison means defining the same task, g
When an autonomous agent does something costly or wrong, the first thing every team reaches for is "show me exactly what happened." But repl
The right amount of human oversight for an AI agent is not a fixed number, it's a dial you tune per task, per stakeholder, and per failure c
A naive retry loop on an AI agent is one of the most expensive ways to fail. Re-running a failed step with the exact same prompt usually pro
Task success rate sounds like one number. It isn't. When a GaaS vendor tells you their agent "succeeds 92% of the time," they've made a doze
A vendor telling you their agent is "99% accurate" is selling you a number that hides the only thing you care about: whether the whole job g
Most agent failures aren't model failures. They're tool-call failures, the agent picked the wrong tool, passed garbage arguments, mis-parse